Recently I flew economy class on Qantas from Sydney to Singapore and back. It was the first time I had flown long haul economy in about 5 years. I was nervous but by keeping the flights to single legs and flying during the day I found it manageable. The Qantas economy experience was better than I expected with some pleasant surprises but still some disappointments in service delivery and entertainment. The service elements drags down an otherwise great experience.
The BOOT rating for Qantas International Economy is a 3.5 out of six or "Good". Here is the detailed review (Details and scoring system for airline seat reviews)
| Getting on Board | |
| | |
| The Seat | |
| | |
| The Service | |
| | |
| The Food | |
| | |
| The Entertainment | |
| I come to any review of Qantas inflight entertainment with a bias drawn from continued system failure and apparent ambivalence from Qantas (previous stories here). On this occasion the entertainment system worked and there was a fine selection of movies but there were sill three annoying features:
1 The placement of the control (see above); 2. The time to activation. Qantas seem to delight in waiting as long as possible before turning on the service and playing compulsory videos to further delay the time before I can press play and zone out. Competitors in this space make videos available as soon as the seatbelt sign is off. On QF it can take as much as 20 mins past that point; and 3 Limited TV shows. Competitors such as Cathay and Virgin Atlantic are offering whole seasons of shows (watched a whole season of '24' on a recent CX flight). These are missing from Qantas. But it was working so can't complain (too much) | |
| The BOOT factor | |
|
1. A trolley service after the main meal with hot chocolate and peppermint tea came as a complete and very pleasant surprise. I would not have thought to ask for peppermint tea but it hit the spot on refreshment mid flight
2. A trip planner leaflet was handed out listing when during the flight things would occur such as meal service. This little thing (which I've not seen before) made the flight more enjoyable as it took out guess work from the flight
| |
| Final Score | |
Details and scoring system for airline seat reviews
thanks to fboosman on flickr for the photo
7 comments:
I believe your rating system would make more sense if:
1) It was out of 10, or 100% (e.g. <25% absolutely terrible, 25% = bad, 50% = acceptable, 75% good. >75% = great)
2) Each of ur criteria should have its own rating out of the total, with the final score being an average of each of the individual ratings.
Just my 2c
i'll double these two cents - here's hoping that the next review will have a more transparent rating...
i'll give the review 4.5 out of 5 with a 0.5 deduction for the scoring system ;)
Hmm, I might have to use your rating system to follow up on my post about flying with Air NZ to LA (http://sam-i-am.travellerspoint.com/100/). It would end up high, regardless of rating system :)
Service is the biggest problem when flying Quantas. It just doesn't compare with other airlines of similar quality.
My impression is that this is because the cabin staff are mainly old unionists, they act more like public service employees than regular service industry staff.
is it just me or do these look like 1970's porno actors ?
Though there is less facilities but there is huge difference in the price as well. So it is also a better option to save your amount as well
Post a Comment