Founded in 1999 they were one of the first to specialise in non-decrementive destination services (by non-decrementive I mean inventory that does not necessarily related to a specific seat on a specific day to a specific event like Ticketmaster or Ticketek).
Though they have had the early lead, this market is now a much more crowded space with each of the major full service players (Expedia, Orbitz, Travelocity etc) now fully stocked with inventory, old world players like GTA making their extensive inventory available through OctopusTravel.com, the meta-search players attacking the space (eg Sidestep) and new entrants emerging every day such as the recently launched Isango.
I put it to Rod that these (especially the full service players) would present a significant challenge for Viator. I asked him about how worried he was about the advantage that the full service player might have in directing their huge flight volumes into a cross sell path involving destination services. Rod had a couple of good replies - here is what he said:
- Search Engines: destination specific search engine traffic (ie "Las Vegas Tours", "Jet Boats in New Zealand" etc) favours the dedicated specialists rather than the full service players;
- Purchase Timing: purchase patterns for destinations services are not (with online consumers) aligned with travel arrangement - customers buy destination services at a later time to air and hotel, nullifying the advantage of the full service providers; and
- Focus: both in terms of the single product and technology focused, but also in their M&A activities including the recent purchase of Vegas based and focused LookTours.
Well done to all at Viator (including some fellow Cendant/Travelport refugees such as great Ken Frohling) and best wishes in the battle with the full service players, meta-search and new entrants.
1 comment:
Viator is a good to find day activities. For multiday tours, GotoBus.com appears to be a better website. At least, The Washington Post thinks so.
Post a Comment